Why don't Muslims value historical artifacts?

Why don't Muslims value historical artifacts?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Regular reminder that the guy who blew them up was mad that 0.1% of the aid budget for Afghanistan was going to restoring and protecting archaeology and historical sites, so he blew them up so he can get mo money fo dem programs.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Buddhists were actually going there for pilgrimage or to worship the big buddha, it wasn't just a historical artifact. If no one were to worship it, there is nothing wrong with preserving it for the sake of history, despite what ISIS(Mossad) does. Also

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ayo muslims dindu nuffin

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah his explanation for his actions was completely moronic. He wanted more gibs but in the meantime completely sunk any hopes of Afghanistan getting sweet tourist money from the site. Muslims can't into economics, which is why so many Muslim countries still depend on resource based economies.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Democratic party and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >talibs say that the statues were preventing money to be spent feeding afghan children therefore they were damaging muslims amd must be destroyed
      >the taliban had caused these starving children, so the taliban itself should be destroyed according to its own logic

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the taliban had caused these starving children
        huh?

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Afghanistan receives Western aid.
          >The Taliban intercepts it and redistributes it to its political allies
          >This results in certain areas not getting any aid
          >The Taliban demands the West send more aid to make up for the discrepancy that Taliban rule caused
          >The West says no, just let us do it
          >The Taliban threatens to blow up the Buddhas if the West doesn't
          >The West still doesn't
          >The Taliban blows the Buddhas up
          >A huge cache of Buddhist texts are founded behind the Buddhas
          >The Taliban seethes

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The Taliban intercepts it and redistributes it to its political allies
            Source?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            This, Afghan warlords don't give shit about their population. Western aid money is used to fund their wars killing each other instead of developing functional country.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's simple, muslims don't value anything except islam.

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't Christians destroy pagan art in the Roman Empire when it was Christianizing?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, thousands of years ago. The rest of the world knew better by 2001.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >2001
        Why did you pick that date, israelite? 9/11 was obviously done by Mossad.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Why did you pick the date the Bamyan Buddhas were destroyed, in a thread about the Bamyan Buddhas?

          Dumb fricks getting dumber by the day.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          The absolute state of Oyish. Is this the dumbest board in Oyish at this point?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Yes, thousands of years ago. The rest of the world knew better by 2001.
        Wrong. Christians were destroying artifacts up to the 1800's.
        Many ancient Menhir stones in France had metal crosses attached to their tops in the 19th century by Christians.
        In Britain they were still breaking up old Pict stones to use in concrete. In Europe Christians were still melting down Bronze age artifacts to recover any gold and silver they might possess in the 19th century.
        Today Christians don't give a flying frick about anything that isn't Christian. They merely avoid destroying artifacts simply because it is illegal now.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty much this. The colosseum would be complete today if it wasn't for christoids using the stones to build Black person churches

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >2001 is in the 1800s

          Dumb frick.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >>2001 is in the 1800s
            >Dumb frick.
            Christians were defacing pagan artifacts only 150 years ago. There is no "thousands of years ago".

            Pretty much this. The colosseum would be complete today if it wasn't for christoids using the stones to build Black person churches

            Exactly, At least the Nimes Arena is comparatively unscathed.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      that was le bad too I guess

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It wasn't a good thing then either.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"If you meet the Buddha, kill him."
    >Linji Yixuan

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Simple, they're the (openly) religious version of Commies. Completely, antithetically, psychotically opposed to everything but their own cult, and completely convinced that everything outside of it is automatically and irredeemably evil that needs to be destroyed. At the very least the Commies don't pretend that everyone was born as a communist.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      If this were true they would have been wiped out centuries or a millennium ago. There wouldn't be anything left to destroy today.

      Most ancient and medieval structures in Europe were destroyed or repurposed by Europeans. The only reason Rome and parts of Italy are preserved the way they are is because most of it was buried in soil until the 20th century. Mussolini's regime alone dug a lot of it up. Even the greatest leader of modern Europe, Napolean, went around vandalizing and stealing across multiple continents.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If this were true they would have been wiped out centuries or a millennium ago.
        They didn't have the material needs you idiot. They did attempt to destroy the pyramids of egypt but it was far beyond their capacity.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        They repeatedly tried to destroy monuments throughout history, most attempts just failed due to lack of technology. Early cannons and guns weren't strong enough to destroy the Buddha carving.

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Muslims don't care about anything other than Islam, sex with little girls and in the Muslim countries that are also Indo-European, sex with transvestites and little boys.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The IEA wasn't cohesive back then, so different factions did different things and it created trouble. There were also a lot of rival and foreign groups operating in the country too. In 1998, eleven Iranian diplomatic staff were murdered by Sipah-e-Sahaba which is a Pakistan-based group. The tension brought Iran and the IEA to the brink of war. Iran was already backing the Northern Alliance rebels.

    The IEA today hasn't been vandalizing any historical artefacts, from what I understand. Had the rest of the world not ignored the suffering of Afghans and engaged with Afghanistan more proactively and productively between the 1990s and early-2000s, then it wouldn't have even happened. It only happened in March 2001 despite the IEA being in power for several years.

    On the other hand, it's Salafi Revisionists that go around actually destroying history on a large scale. They did it in the Arabian Peninsula in the past and they've been doing it across Subsaharan Africa, Libya, Syria and Iraq in more recent times. Salafists not only target pre-Islamic and non-Muslim structures, they also target Muslim historical structures. The IEA doesn't destroy mausoleums and in fact Kandahar, which is the IEA's heartland, has always had them.

    If pre-Islamic archeology needed to destroyed outright then it would have been done over a thousand years ago or during the first few centuries of Muslim rule. It is insane to assume that people today need to destroy what wasn't destroyed by far more authoritative figures before us. Salafist Arabs destroyed historical structures and built hotels and malls in their place and then went on to spend billions on Western art including shirk and even a fake Da Vinci painting of Jesus.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    because Israel destroys them

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Afghanis are still buttmad that their entire country and history still revovles around a Bihari man from India so they cope by doing this

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    People wanting to preserve history is my biggest pet peeve. Let go. It's all garbage. Just let go, chud.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day, garbage.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Incel vibes. Big ick.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          silly bait

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not bait. You are legit a chud if you care about preserving history. The world is so much bigger than the past. It really doesn't matter who did what.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Empirical knowledge all depends on the past
            Identity is composed by identity shaping who you are now. Definitions of the past inform current people as to who they are and their values. Ofc you know that you revisionist troony

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Never seen someone grasp at straws so hard.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Never seen someone grasp at straws so hard.
            You shove straws up your ass troony anon?

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because they are subhuman?

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >The world is so much bigger than the past. It really doesn't matter who did what.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Islam
    >making sense

    Phew

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everything IS transient whichever Form IT May Take, whoever Made IT beside god, whatever greatness or Status IT May have Had among men. Everything; except the face of the most merciful, Allah.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *