Why didn't the Islamic world help the iberian Muslims? They literally 'created a monster' by failing to stop the reconquista and because of Christianity spread all across the world.
Why didn't they do shit? They had dozens of Islamic nations of the caliphate to muster a counter offensive. Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force or are Arabs moronic?
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
Arabs were always moronic at war.
They just appeared in the right time when the Romans and Persians were weakened from infighting.
All arabs are good at is walking around a cube 30 times
T. Buck broken moorberian who has been part of mena states for 1500 years
>Why didn't the christian world help the Balkan christians? They literally 'created a monster' by failing to stop the ottomans and because of Islam spread all across the balkans.
The same answer, because "muslim world" is even more of a meme than "christendom"
>not answering the question
moron or glowie shill.
Also Christondom fought in the Balkans numerous times and by the 18th-19th century Islamic control was failing and practically usurped by 1910.
The Muslims never made such attemps on iberia even when Spain was becoming weak by the 19th century. It still had colonies by the time of the civil war
>we fought back a big after the empire decayed and raped hundreds of thousands of Christians for 400+ years
Because of the orthodox Vs catholic schism. Catholics aren't going to help orthodox countries. Vience happy waged a crusade against Constantinople.
No one was crusading without the pope's approval because taking their armies across Europe would leave their own nations vulnerable.
Christians reconquered catholic hungary and austria. They didn't go further because balkanoids and by extension orthodoxoids are hopless savages
They did several times, look up the Almoravids and Almohads. Generally each wave pushed the Christians back until the new muslim empire collapsed.
Because Iberia was too far away for its loss to Christians to matter for any Muslim empires strong enough to do anything about it.
They did.
There were fricking Kurds and Syrians in Las Navas de Tolosa
Really ?
>arabs
>Really ?
Yes.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalla_de_las_Navas_de_Tolosa#Fuerzas_musulmanas
Seems kinda weird
I tought there was only berbers, nubians and iberian muslims
>nubians
My bad i meant ssa slaves warriors
Not exactly nubians
It was like a muslim crusade, they made a big call and warriors from all the ummah travelled to Spain
The saadi dynasty was pure arabian stock, and the regency of Algeria only paid lip service for the ottomans.
They did. Three different north African empires attempted it
Arabs controlled iberia for 800 years, hispanics controlled the new world for only 300 years, hope this help
Also
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alc%C3%A1cer_Quibir
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algiers_expedition_(1541)
We still kept buckbreaking you
50% of Iberia was free of muslims by year 900.
In fact, 99% of Iberia (rural areas) had zero muslims ever.
>In fact, 99% of Iberia (rural areas) had zero muslims ever.
99% of iberians today are nonwhite moor rapebabies, seems like the bullshit propaganda you're taught in school doesn't conflate with modern genetics
>50% of Iberia was free of muslims by year 900
This is what Christianis controlled up until 1080
Moorberians eternally BTFO
>Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force
If you get raped nonstop by moors for 800 years then you suck at fighting
Al-Andalus was the last chance for Spain. Sadly they got defeated by savages from mountains who deindustrialized and depopulated the country
Spain's birthrates have been shit ever since the reconquesta
How the hell did the Spaniards claim all that land in the north Americas when even 18th century nations couldn't beat back the natives without trickery of treaties and technology nearly 200 years later? Did the Spanish just explore set maybe one little shitty fort settlement and claimed a territory the size of Colorado whenever they did? Did the natives know they were under Spanish rule at those times?
>Did the Spanish just explore set maybe one little shitty fort settlement and claimed a territory the size of Colorado whenever they did?
Yes
>Did the natives know they were under Spanish rule at those times?
No
It was literal map-painting autism, neither Alaskans nor Patagonians were even aware of some siestaBlack folk existing, yet alone claiming their lands
If you learnt how to read a map you would see that Alaska was never claimed as Spanish territory, seething panchito. Only the territory of Nutca which was barely even inhabited.
>they didn't claim one frozen shithole they had zero presence in, they claimed another frozen shithole they had zero presence in!
ok
there were settlements there moron
Because we were less moronic than others it seems.
In New Arizona:
>In 1747, a Spanish and Puebloan force of more than 500 men attacked a Comanche and Ute camp near the Chama River, killing 107 of the Indians and capturing 206. In 1751, Spanish and Puebloan troops trapped 300 Comanche in a box canyon and killed 112 and captured 33. These defeats caused the Comanche to sue for peace
>The last major battle between the New Mexican settlers and the Comanche took place in 1779. The governor of New Mexico, Juan Bautista de Anza, an experienced Indian fighter, took the war to the Comanche in their own country. With 800 men, including 200 Ute and Apache auxiliaries, he marched north and killed Cuerno Verde ("Green Horn") the most important Comanche war leader and many of his followers in the Greenhorn Valley south of Pueblo, Colorado.
In Texas they achieved a minor success at the battle of the two rivers were an outnumbered spanish army was defeated with the staggering casualties of... 19 dead. After that they conducted a series of minor, mostly unsuccessful raids and begged for peace because they were decimated by smallpox.
And there were like 200 Spaniards in Texas and NA (plus a few thousands indios and mestizos serfs).
They would only achieve significant successes after the fall of the Spanish government and its replacement by Mexico.
>Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force
lol no they just got lucky
Arabs wouldn't have the need to initiate the age of discovery, or it would have been delayed at least some hundred of years more.