Why didn't the Islamic world help the iberian Muslims?

Why didn't the Islamic world help the iberian Muslims? They literally 'created a monster' by failing to stop the reconquista and because of Christianity spread all across the world.
Why didn't they do shit? They had dozens of Islamic nations of the caliphate to muster a counter offensive. Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force or are Arabs moronic?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Arabs were always moronic at war.

    They just appeared in the right time when the Romans and Persians were weakened from infighting.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      All arabs are good at is walking around a cube 30 times

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        T. Buck broken moorberian who has been part of mena states for 1500 years

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why didn't the christian world help the Balkan christians? They literally 'created a monster' by failing to stop the ottomans and because of Islam spread all across the balkans.

    The same answer, because "muslim world" is even more of a meme than "christendom"

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >not answering the question
      moron or glowie shill.
      Also Christondom fought in the Balkans numerous times and by the 18th-19th century Islamic control was failing and practically usurped by 1910.
      The Muslims never made such attemps on iberia even when Spain was becoming weak by the 19th century. It still had colonies by the time of the civil war

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >we fought back a big after the empire decayed and raped hundreds of thousands of Christians for 400+ years

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because of the orthodox Vs catholic schism. Catholics aren't going to help orthodox countries. Vience happy waged a crusade against Constantinople.

      No one was crusading without the pope's approval because taking their armies across Europe would leave their own nations vulnerable.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Christians reconquered catholic hungary and austria. They didn't go further because balkanoids and by extension orthodoxoids are hopless savages

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    They did several times, look up the Almoravids and Almohads. Generally each wave pushed the Christians back until the new muslim empire collapsed.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Iberia was too far away for its loss to Christians to matter for any Muslim empires strong enough to do anything about it.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    They did.
    There were fricking Kurds and Syrians in Las Navas de Tolosa

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Really ?

      Arabs controlled iberia for 800 years, hispanics controlled the new world for only 300 years, hope this help
      Also
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alc%C3%A1cer_Quibir
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algiers_expedition_(1541)
      We still kept buckbreaking you

      >arabs

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Really ?
        Yes.
        https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalla_de_las_Navas_de_Tolosa#Fuerzas_musulmanas

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Seems kinda weird
          I tought there was only berbers, nubians and iberian muslims

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >nubians
            My bad i meant ssa slaves warriors
            Not exactly nubians

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It was like a muslim crusade, they made a big call and warriors from all the ummah travelled to Spain

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The saadi dynasty was pure arabian stock, and the regency of Algeria only paid lip service for the ottomans.

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    They did. Three different north African empires attempted it

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Arabs controlled iberia for 800 years, hispanics controlled the new world for only 300 years, hope this help
    Also
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Alc%C3%A1cer_Quibir
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algiers_expedition_(1541)
    We still kept buckbreaking you

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      50% of Iberia was free of muslims by year 900.
      In fact, 99% of Iberia (rural areas) had zero muslims ever.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >In fact, 99% of Iberia (rural areas) had zero muslims ever.
        99% of iberians today are nonwhite moor rapebabies, seems like the bullshit propaganda you're taught in school doesn't conflate with modern genetics

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >50% of Iberia was free of muslims by year 900
        This is what Christianis controlled up until 1080

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Moorberians eternally BTFO

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force
    If you get raped nonstop by moors for 800 years then you suck at fighting

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Al-Andalus was the last chance for Spain. Sadly they got defeated by savages from mountains who deindustrialized and depopulated the country

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Spain's birthrates have been shit ever since the reconquesta

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    How the hell did the Spaniards claim all that land in the north Americas when even 18th century nations couldn't beat back the natives without trickery of treaties and technology nearly 200 years later? Did the Spanish just explore set maybe one little shitty fort settlement and claimed a territory the size of Colorado whenever they did? Did the natives know they were under Spanish rule at those times?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Did the Spanish just explore set maybe one little shitty fort settlement and claimed a territory the size of Colorado whenever they did?
      Yes
      >Did the natives know they were under Spanish rule at those times?
      No

      It was literal map-painting autism, neither Alaskans nor Patagonians were even aware of some siestaBlack folk existing, yet alone claiming their lands

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you learnt how to read a map you would see that Alaska was never claimed as Spanish territory, seething panchito. Only the territory of Nutca which was barely even inhabited.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >they didn't claim one frozen shithole they had zero presence in, they claimed another frozen shithole they had zero presence in!
          ok

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            there were settlements there moron

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because we were less moronic than others it seems.
      In New Arizona:
      >In 1747, a Spanish and Puebloan force of more than 500 men attacked a Comanche and Ute camp near the Chama River, killing 107 of the Indians and capturing 206. In 1751, Spanish and Puebloan troops trapped 300 Comanche in a box canyon and killed 112 and captured 33. These defeats caused the Comanche to sue for peace
      >The last major battle between the New Mexican settlers and the Comanche took place in 1779. The governor of New Mexico, Juan Bautista de Anza, an experienced Indian fighter, took the war to the Comanche in their own country. With 800 men, including 200 Ute and Apache auxiliaries, he marched north and killed Cuerno Verde ("Green Horn") the most important Comanche war leader and many of his followers in the Greenhorn Valley south of Pueblo, Colorado.
      In Texas they achieved a minor success at the battle of the two rivers were an outnumbered spanish army was defeated with the staggering casualties of... 19 dead. After that they conducted a series of minor, mostly unsuccessful raids and begged for peace because they were decimated by smallpox.
      And there were like 200 Spaniards in Texas and NA (plus a few thousands indios and mestizos serfs).
      They would only achieve significant successes after the fall of the Spanish government and its replacement by Mexico.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Were the the Spanish that good a fighting force
    lol no they just got lucky

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Arabs wouldn't have the need to initiate the age of discovery, or it would have been delayed at least some hundred of years more.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *