Why are people so religiously blind to the dangers of nuclear power?

Why are people so religiously blind to the dangers of nuclear power? If any other technology had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of prime land uninhabitable there would be a healthy level of skepticism but if you so much as breathe the word "chernobyl" around the rick and morty crowd they'll start screeching about coal as if they can't think straight.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    fukushima

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    tell me op pic

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If any other technology had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of prime land uninhabitable there would be a healthy level of skepti-

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      i buy dawn dish soap because they save ducks

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people so religiously blind to the dangers of being alive? If any other state of being had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of people dead there would be a healthy level of skepticism but if you so much as breathe the word "yolo" around the nihilist crowd they'll start screeching about no meaning of life as if they can't think straight.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes we should go back to coal instead and ignore the 20k casualties a year from just mining the stuff

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If any other technology had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of prime land uninhabitable

    Ahahahahaa.

    *Wheeeze.*

    Hahahahhahahahah.

    I'm sure if you added up all the fly ash spills and the mining runoff the amount of land ruined by coal would be higher than nuclear incidents as well. They're not even comparable in the amount of damage you tard

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      OP asked about land, not people. don't you know that in the US it's land that gets to vote, not people?

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    More people have died to coal then nuclear

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they'll start screeching about coal as if they can't think straight.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        More people have died to coal then nuclear

        >If any other technology had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of prime land uninhabitable

        Ahahahahaa.

        *Wheeeze.*

        Hahahahhahahahah.

        I'm sure if you added up all the fly ash spills and the mining runoff the amount of land ruined by coal would be higher than nuclear incidents as well. They're not even comparable in the amount of damage you tard

        Yes we should go back to coal instead and ignore the 20k casualties a year from just mining the stuff

        like clockwork

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >make stupid statement
          >if you disagree with me you're a gay Black person
          >WOW LOOK AT ALL THESE GAY Black folk LIKE CLOCKWORK
          Have you considered you're just stupid

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    We have small modulars today that come with built-in safeties and could be more easily produced that your average powerplant building. They are not as efficient as the big plants, but I think it's a step in right direction. Small Modular Reactors or watchamacall them.

    Might need to warm up a few politicians and displace some oil lobbies here...

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    nucleartards be like:
    >2 more weeks until safe and secure fusion i swear!

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody mentioned fusion you dickhead.

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people so religiously blind to the dangers of coal power? If any other technology had a proven track record of rendering large amounts of prime land uninhabitable there would be a healthy level of skepticism but if you so much as breathe the word "appalachia" around the rick and morty crowd they'll start screeching about nuclear as if they can't think straight.

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm paid to be religiously blind
    Glad I could answer your question

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    chernobyl was just moronic communist mismanagement and nuclear power has gotten much safer nowadays. no reason why we should still be using fossil fuels, but we're stuck with it because the corporations that produce them are in bed with the state.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    i'm not a moronic leftist who screams the end is near every moment of their life.

    nuclear power is safe and effective.

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao who cares you friggin nerd. We NEED more power. More profitable power especially. If some poorgay territory gets irradiated who gives a frick.

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the payoff nuclear offers is incredible. Look at how much land has to be used for renewable, not mentioning natural variables like cloud coverage or wind speed that would affect it. Fossil fuels have their own set of problems.

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    lack of perspective.
    also quick reminder, most people don't give a frick about tomorrow, or about anything that happens once they're gone. they'll sell you anything, by any means

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine the alternatives being so deadly that catastrophic meltdowns don't look too bad

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *