Multiple Bibles, old and new, to gain more perspective and observe different textual criticism throughout the ages. Scholars have many disagreements on scripture, so it's important to learn multiple perspectives.
[...]
Heretics. KJV was divinely inspired.
KJV is nothing more than an English translation of the Bible. It is one of the best, but it can be improved as well, just like previous English Bibles before it and other translations that came after.
There is none. Your best bet is reading several Bibles (KJV, NIV, and Douay-Rheims) at the same time alongside something like Strong's Concordance to get a better insight into what a particular word means and where else it appears in scripture.
No. The Bishops' Bible is the real English Bible. God said so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bishops%27_Bible
1 year ago
Anonymous
God.
You're both wrong. This is the real Bible. Jehovah said so. It's right there in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness. Are you calling Jehovah a liar?
1 year ago
Anonymous
The guy is literally named TIMOTHY. Does that not sound Bri'ish to you or what? Proof Anglos wrote the Bible.
Literally ANNOTATED by humans, possibly homosexuals.
Repent and accept the KJV, the true word of God, who is Anglo.
1 year ago
Anonymous
1 year ago
Anonymous
Orthodox Study Bible is best overall. If I had to pick one I'd pick that one even though it is NKJV. However you can easily remedy this by just reading the KJV/1904 Greek Patriarchal text and Septuagint with the OSB's notes to accompany you. Just make sure to get a physical copy of the OSB because the pdf's notes were horribly implemented.
Catholic study Bibles are marred by papist innovations and Catholicism as a whole is internally inconsistent; overall it's ok. Protestants lack the intelligence to create an honest and lasting belief system without Apostolic succession.
>God, who is Anglo
Jesus makes no mention of bathing in swamps and eating beans on toast
How God chooses to reveal his word is of no consequence to me. You are advocating the Fr*nch one, I assume? Death to Fr*nce. God save the king.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>being this heckin' on the dot in this god-forsaken board
It's like finding a well stocked, brightly lit cabin in the middle of the woods at the dead of night. Your posts are like a warm, safe relief from the horrors of this gay world.
KJV.
Multiple Bibles, old and new, to gain more perspective and observe different textual criticism throughout the ages. Scholars have many disagreements on scripture, so it's important to learn multiple perspectives.
KJV is nothing more than an English translation of the Bible. It is one of the best, but it can be improved as well, just like previous English Bibles before it and other translations that came after.
There is none. Your best bet is reading several Bibles (KJV, NIV, and Douay-Rheims) at the same time alongside something like Strong's Concordance to get a better insight into what a particular word means and where else it appears in scripture.
Heretics. KJV was divinely inspired.
>KJV was divinely inspired.
Source?
God.
No. The Bishops' Bible is the real English Bible. God said so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bishops%27_Bible
You're both wrong. This is the real Bible. Jehovah said so. It's right there in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness. Are you calling Jehovah a liar?
The guy is literally named TIMOTHY. Does that not sound Bri'ish to you or what? Proof Anglos wrote the Bible.
Heretic. The NOAB was divinely inspired.
Literally ANNOTATED by humans, possibly homosexuals.
Repent and accept the KJV, the true word of God, who is Anglo.
Orthodox Study Bible is best overall. If I had to pick one I'd pick that one even though it is NKJV. However you can easily remedy this by just reading the KJV/1904 Greek Patriarchal text and Septuagint with the OSB's notes to accompany you. Just make sure to get a physical copy of the OSB because the pdf's notes were horribly implemented.
Catholic study Bibles are marred by papist innovations and Catholicism as a whole is internally inconsistent; overall it's ok. Protestants lack the intelligence to create an honest and lasting belief system without Apostolic succession.
>God, who is Anglo
Jesus makes no mention of bathing in swamps and eating beans on toast
Oh so you're a member of the Church of England bow to the British monarch? Right on. You're using their state-made Bible after all.
How God chooses to reveal his word is of no consequence to me. You are advocating the Fr*nch one, I assume? Death to Fr*nce. God save the king.
>being this heckin' on the dot in this god-forsaken board
It's like finding a well stocked, brightly lit cabin in the middle of the woods at the dead of night. Your posts are like a warm, safe relief from the horrors of this gay world.
The New Oxford Annotated Bible
Side-by-side comparison of Douay Rheims with Jerome's vulgate.
Masoretic is corrupt and stems from the 9th century AD.
Dead Sea Scrolls are forgeries.
Greek Septuagint is the oldest and most canon, but also incredibly lost, surviving only through Jerome's Vulgate.
Everything else is protshit or Ortho-fanfic. The Orthodox boldly invented three books for inclusion between the 13th-15th centuries.