The image that broke atheism

The image that broke atheism

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    G-d damns Christians for idolatry and blasphemy

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    that would be Einstein

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    that would be Einstein

    Obviously, this. Most normies dont know who the frick vohn Newmahn is. Whereas every single person on the world knows who Einstein-steal-all-credit-is

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It really should be the other way around tbh
      a lot of von neumanns work was and is directly applicable to our modern lives, meanwhile Einstein's crowning achievement is some gay ass plagiarized equation that has and will never have a direct impact on anyone ever

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >a lot of von neumanns work was and is directly applicable to our modern lives
        No it wasn't... He's nothing more than a career academic, aka glorified welfare parasite just like Einstein.
        Another israelite too.
        Funny How Christians that worship the israelite Jesus and the israeli apostles also try to paint their religion as intelligent by namedropping famous israelites lol.
        They are the most spiritually cucked people of all time.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah but which God? And think carefully, picking the wrong God can and WILL send you to the magic lava pits forever.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Still choosing one gives me the statistical advantage over atheists.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        what happens if the real god ends up being a diety that sends people who worship a religion to hell

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Though God commanded you to marry and have children, there's no issue with remaining celibate, it's much better than to be adulterous or a sodomite.
        Though God commanded you to worship him, there's no issue with remaining non-religious, it's far better than to worship other Gods or to worship him wrong.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        it doesn't, more religions send you to hell for following false gods than do for not believing (assuming you're a good person)

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >It makes more sense to believe in God given the risks of not believing.
    >Therefore it's true that God exists.
    Non sequitur.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      now try typing that without crying

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Think you’re projecting emotions onto him man, that was a pretty level headed post.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          maybe on planet moron

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Christians result to insults and oersonal attacks
            >Smugly claim victory while wondering why nobody under 30 goes to their church

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    1. Other religions exist (https://youtu.be/4pkWGvTFfSY?si=jsLOAounSptrfCre)
    2. Faith is not option

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      ...And just mentioning: I'm a theist. Just not a Christian.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      What happens if you qualify for multiple hells
      Do the gods have to compete for which one gets to send you to their hell or do you get to choose

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >tfw Zeus and Yahweh have to duke it out with the Seven Lords of Xibolba and Amit over who gets to frick my soul up in the afterlife
        Feels good, who do you think is gonna win?

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Zeus is high-T and fricks multiple women, God’s got zero b***hes.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought israelites were intelligent

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is no a reason to suppose the hypothetical God couldn't be also a fan of wacky mischief who sends theists to hell and atheists to heaven, thus balancing the things out

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Okay, but which god do I have to praise to not end up in hell? Yahweh? Allah? Zeus?

    Also, dick move by god considering majority of the planets population didnt even know of him untill 400 years ago.

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >pascal wager argument
    into the trash it goes
    >but he is le heckin smart
    doesn't change the fact its a shit tier argument

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nope, Pascal's Wager is dumb

    Also, said deity may be offended anyways at the idea that you only believe in him as insurance instead of a matter of pure faith

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pascal wager argument
      into the trash it goes
      >but he is le heckin smart
      doesn't change the fact its a shit tier argument

      ok but y u mad doe bb

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        because you're telling me I'm going to be tortured for all eternity for merely existing

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          you know the bible never says anything about that and hell as a place is essentially fanfiction right

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Even if you go off JW fanfics, it's not much better. Being soul-murdered is about as bad as getting tortured forever.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I take a literal interpretation, if hell/damnation is being completely deprived of God then youre probably reincarnated in some lower dimension that sucks or something along those lines
            wouldnt be surprised if this is that lower dimension tbh

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            i know
            >lower dimension but shitty
            is basically the same thing as hell, but i guess i mean less pitchforks and lava and more boring and droll

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >then youre probably reincarnated in some lower dimension that sucks or something along those lines
            …and how would one know if they were already in this shitty plane

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            exactly why i said i wouldn't be surprised if this is that plane of existence
            would explain the apparent silence of god, if all the stuff that happened in the Bible/other holy books was on a higher plane of existence and the bible/religion in general just exists as a catalyst to try and be better and ascend to said plane

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Great graph initiative

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Using C.S. Lewis as the far end of the bell curve is hilarious considering he is a prime example of a midwit regarding philosophy. And Pascal’s Wager? Don’t make me laugh. It you wanted an example of someone actually intelligent who believes in God you should have used Plato, Shankara, Ramanuja, or even Nagarjuna lmfao

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks that's C.S Lewis
      nobody tells him

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Intelligence is believing in God

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Negative correlation between religiosity and IQ.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Now try typing that without crying

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Who hurt you?

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          See

          >umm akshally im really le smort
          >this piece of paper with numbers on it says so
          >now excuse me while i eat crayons
          atheists

          The fool hath said in his heart there is no God.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >you are dumb because uuhh you get your worldview from research papers
            I want you to go up to your professor/boss and claim that research is for midwits, make sure to record it as well, just to see how long it will take for them to ask if you have some sort of mental issue

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >NO NO its true because the smort people said so. Only stupid people think for themselves, trust the science

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >think for yourself
            >and by that I mean just have contrarian views even if there is nothing to actually back them up

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >and by back them up I mean holy science priests say so

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >its fake because uuuuhhh it just is
            >no I won't actually post anything to prove my argument
            >or put in any effort to disprove anything my opponents laid out beyond saying its wrong
            the next few decades will be fun to watch as your religion continues to decline in any place were the population can actually read

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            now try typing that while having a sub 80 BMI

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            BMI...

            Is renaming week on science?

            Someone wanted that bonus b4 christmas

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >still wants to be considered high IQ

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's John von Neumann.
      He was a key figure in the Manhattan Project.
      He proposed to nuke Kyoto rather than Hiroshima, simply to kill more people, and to destroy Japanese cultural achievements.
      I do not understand why a maniacally murderous israelite is used by OP as an argument.
      He was a monster, a little squeamish worm, who disregarded all life on earth in order to create the nuclear bomb.
      At the time they didn't know if it was going to ignite the atmosphere and end all life on the planets surface.

      Danke Juden!
      Wir haben die falsche Seite unterstützt...

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He proposed to nuke Kyoto rather than Hiroshima, simply to kill more people, and to destroy Japanese cultural achievements.
        Why am I not surprised this idea came foom~~*them*~~?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >actually intelligent who believes in God you should have used Plato
      He was definitely polytheist.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe God is much more forgiving of those who worship no gods than those who dick ride a false God. Are you doing tricks on the right one?

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    If the bell curve meme was real, all the the idiots would've been balanced out by the geniuses, and there wouldn't be a negative correlation between religiosity and IQ.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      theres a positive correlation for it, just so happens that alot of the people you think are intelligent are actually midwits

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >there is a postive correlation
        and do you have anything to actually back that up with

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do you?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not the one claiming there is a positive correlation, so no.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No, I don't.
            We know

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23921675/
            by the way this single article alone refernces 63 studies that came to the same conclusion

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No, I don't.
            We know

            I'm not the one claiming there is a positive correlation, so no.

            >replication crisis citation
            lol

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >get btfo'd
            >well uh muh replication crisis
            >he says when each study keeps coming to the same conclusion
            >still hasn't show any evidence for his claim

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >alot of the people you think are intelligent
            ...are intelligent because they scored above average on IQ tests, the best, most objective measure of intelligence.

            >midwit cope

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >no bro you don't understand, providing proof of your claim is actually peak midwit
            the only positive thing I can say about you morons is you are an endless source of keks

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            y u mad doe bb

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >alot of the people you think are intelligent
        ...are intelligent because they scored above average on IQ tests, the best, most objective measure of intelligence.

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >umm akshally im really le smort
    >this piece of paper with numbers on it says so
    >now excuse me while i eat crayons
    atheists

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >C S Lewis

    >one and only marriage was in his late '50s
    >to a israeli women in her '40s with two adult kids already
    >generally suspected to be the Inkling that molested Tolkien's son (who later went on to be a homosexual pedophile himself)

    They're not sending their best

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      See

      >he thinks that's C.S Lewis
      nobody tells him

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They're not sending their best
      ironic coming from a literal moron who not only says 'muh joos' but is also face blind.

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP that quote's really bad.
    Even if I accept the logic of Pascal's wager, it does not prove there is a God. Pascal did not consider it an argument for God.
    Whoever you're quoting really misses the point of what the wager is about.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pascal is actually fairly popular among presuppositionalists and it seems like nobody else reads him

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        nah this is one of the most famous lines of apologetics.

        But at least for presuppositionalists it's on brand for them since they don't bother to try to prove God exists.

  18. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like how theists are the trolls these days. I'm willing to bet not one of you actually believe in God

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's more of a political statement than anything else to prove that they're "trad".

  19. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >people are so buck broken by the idea of hell that they unironically think that is a good argument

  20. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, sounds like you could get Von Neumann to do literally anything just by suggesting he'd suffer eternal damnation otherwise. After all, that's at least the bare possibility that it's true. Good thing no one took advantage of that, well, except whoever benefited from his God belief.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Good thing no one took advantage of that, well, except whoever benefited from his God belief.
      Nobody really benefited from it, at least mot while jer was alive. He lived most od his life as an atheist and converted to Catholicism on his deathbed

  21. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The problem with this image is that it assumes that if there is a God, then he necessarily punishes you to eternal/long-lasting damnation for merely not saying "I believe in God".

    This is a Judeo-Christian dogma

  22. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It makes sense that only an autistic israelite like von Neumann would take Pascal's wager seriously.

  23. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Riddle me the fiddle:
    Bad thing happen to good fellows.
    Good thing happen to bad fellows.

    Therefricker?

  24. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keep in mind that if you worship YHWH the wrong way you will still end up in magic lava

  25. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pascal's Wager is midwit moron shit and doesn't qualify in most religions

  26. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only intelligent persons alternative theistically is to consider 'god' as the force inherent causing in the birth & definition of our universe. Nothing else

  27. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The first and second sentences from von Neumann are separate quotes, and the first was said on his deathbed, which doesn't suggest particularly devout or sincere religiosity to me, personally.
    Any the actual best part of this thread is more than one person confusing him with C.S. Lewis.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I also thought he was CS Lewis but realized my mistake before posting about it.

  28. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >pascal's wager
    Get new material

  29. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    John Von Neumann didn't day that.

  30. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pascal's wager is incredibly moronic to anyone who thinks about it for more than 2 minutes. there are a million gods and religions and different religious principles - they all can argue pascal's wager for their particular religion

    equal chance god wants you to be atheist for that matter

  31. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Suppose god is real.

    No what?

    Why do you have to believe in it? How do you know this is what it wants? Says who?

    >the bible says so
    Why is your specific sect THE TRUE ONE out of all the millions of other ones? who's to say some small tribe of Marsh Arabs with their own take on Bah'aism are the ones who truly figured it out?

  32. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    this pic is better
    but still, you need experience with the Divine to truly believe

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      What if my experience with Divinity contradicts Christianity?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        contradicts it how? if you experienced the Divine' touch, you know that God exists, you either worked for it through prayer, or you were saved because you were suffering, those are all common experiences we read from people who experienced the holy spirit (saints or otherwise_

  33. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >pascal's wager
    you're only wagering a person who believes vs who doesn't believe, the wager doesn't prove god, it doesn't talk about god at all, absolute non sequitur,
    this is what happens when low IQ stemcucks try to dabble in philosophy

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *