Is it morally justifiable in 2023 to worship Mohammed, a known warlord and pervert?
Is it morally justifiable in 2023 to worship Mohammed, a known warlord and pervert?
Talk religion
Talk religion
Is it morally justifiable in 2023 to worship Mohammed, a known warlord and pervert?
He didn't exist.
He's the one Abrahamicuckold idol that has actual evidence of his existence, the only one whose birth and death dates are agreed upon (since they are supported with evidence).
Meanwhile Jesus/Abraham/Moses/etc are just words on a page, nobody could tell you the exact time they supposedly lived.
>He's the one Abrahamicuckold idol that has actual evidence of his existence
there is no evidence, in fact mohammad is a title not a name
>He didn't exist.
that doesn't really answer my question though
according to one (1) germcuck who won't even disclose his real name
Who's worshipping him? I'd also like your definitions of warlord and pervert before I refute
Pervert
>a person whose sexual behaviour is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable.
Warlord
>a person who exercises military, economic, and political control over a region, often in a country without a strong national government; largely because of coercive control over the armed forces
He was neither of those. You didn't answer the first question
>who's worshipping him
Muslims
>He was neither of those.
He had sexual intercourse with Aisha, a 9 year old girl. This is sexually deviant
The idea that he wasn't a warlord is laughable so I don't feel the need to justify it
Muslims worship God.
Age of consent is a modern construct and it's not known whether Aisha had reached puberty at 9, if that's what age their marriage was consummated, it is assumed that she had and it's not uncommon for girls that young to reach womanhood.
Muhammad (pbuh) had a government with law, regulation, division of labour, and organised state run activities meanwhile he did not control the military by coercion rather all his military were volunteers
>Muslims worship God.
Then why can't they show pictures of Mohammed?
>Age of consent is a modern construct and it's not known whether Aisha had reached puberty at 9, if that's what age their marriage was consummated, it is assumed that she had and it's not uncommon for girls that young to reach womanhood.
cope
>Muhammad (pbuh) had a government with law, regulation, division of labour, and organised state run activities meanwhile he did not control the military by coercion rather all his military were volunteers
He was a bandit who besieged local towns and pillaged them
>Then why can't they show pictures of Mohammed?
so people don't start worshipping them
how come we have this thread literally every day and people still don't know the first thing about islam
muslims already worship muhammad, so that doesn't seem like an effective tactic
>Then why can't they show pictures of Mohammed
This applies to all Prophets, so I guess Muslims worship Abraham and the rest
Except there was a mural of Jesus and Mary in the kaaba which was saved from the destruction of the idols.
>a mural of Jesus and Mary in the kaaba
fairytale
>warlord
In line with Biblical figures, don't see the issue here
I think that krafft ebing also wanted to have sex with 9 year old girls
who?
Why do you think it's true that God prefers child raping murdering monotheists over virtuous polytheists?
Unironically no
>Mohammed, a known warlord
Only a judaized slave would think a noble warlord and steward of people is a negative traits. Precisely because Islam spread like a voracious lion instead of an urban blight is why it superior of Jesusism
Anything is morally justifiable.
Yes since might makes right and he was pretty mighty.
Being a warlord is based btw