typically if you said you "read" a writer it means you read most, if not all, of their works, but generally it just means you understand them and their philosophy
Corrected the 'divine mistakes' of Plato and Socrates by setting the direction for the future of our civilisation with art, Dionysus, instead of the philosophy, Apollo, of the last millennia. This and many other things in Wagner would be of enormous influence on Nietzsche. Perfected Schopenhauer's philosophy. Developed a broad critique of Hegel's political philosophy but also amalgamized his most important ideas. Gave the truest expression of Christianity in all art, laying the ground for the revival of God.
Nietzsche and Wagner are not nearly as important as you HItlerites wish they were. >truest expression of Christianity
With pagan myths that inspired a policult of psychopaths and an atheist-hero? Yeah, boy, he really laid the groundwork alright.
I'm trying to read Hegel as well, apparently he pretty much changed the course of history. But I still got a bunch of Greeks, Descartes, Kant to go through. Did you skip those? How readable was Hegel?
Kierkegaard, Weininger.
I second Kierkegaard.
Guénon.
read to Eugene O'Neill, andThomas Mann
>What’s next?
Rope.
Why?
Mostafa Mahmoud
Kant
This is the way. Get an actual understanding of what eternity is in relation to time. They are two different things.
You did not read the whole bible
Not OP, but I did, so why couldn't he? I've read certain books of the Bible probably 30 or 40 times.
Boethius bruh
I dont want to ride the wheel of fortune anymore
I WANT OFF MISS FORTUNA'S WILD RIDE
I would be satisfied with all the requirements listed, including Miss Fortuna's wheel.
what is your conclusion? what if i broke your vase?
Only one of them tells you what to do.
The rest are pretty dense...
"Oh man, this is heavy...."
Spinoza and FH Bradley.
Husserl
>I read
What does that mean exactly? You read ALL of their works? Noob here.
typically if you said you "read" a writer it means you read most, if not all, of their works, but generally it just means you understand them and their philosophy
I read DEEZE NUTS
>generally it just means you understand them and their philosophy
Good to know, it's less daunting now
>generally it just means you understand them and their philosophy
I read their wikipedia articles. I read them.
WAGNER WAGNER WAGNER
WAGNER WAGNER WAGNER
Corrected the 'divine mistakes' of Plato and Socrates by setting the direction for the future of our civilisation with art, Dionysus, instead of the philosophy, Apollo, of the last millennia. This and many other things in Wagner would be of enormous influence on Nietzsche. Perfected Schopenhauer's philosophy. Developed a broad critique of Hegel's political philosophy but also amalgamized his most important ideas. Gave the truest expression of Christianity in all art, laying the ground for the revival of God.
>that image
Do you approve of Mahler's music as well?
Nietzsche and Wagner are not nearly as important as you HItlerites wish they were.
>truest expression of Christianity
With pagan myths that inspired a policult of psychopaths and an atheist-hero? Yeah, boy, he really laid the groundwork alright.
Bad idea
Getting a job
I'm trying to read Hegel as well, apparently he pretty much changed the course of history. But I still got a bunch of Greeks, Descartes, Kant to go through. Did you skip those? How readable was Hegel?