>creates atheism, influences Marx, Nietzsche, Freud and destroys Western civilization

>creates atheism, influences Marx, Nietzsche, Freud and destroys Western civilization
What was his problem?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't know who that is, but he didn't create atheism. The idea of atheism existed in Ancient Greece.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s Ludwig Feuerbach

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sure the Greeks were a bunch of homosexuals, but I think OP means atheism in the sense of not believing in a god

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ever heard of Thales?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >God is water
          wow ty

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            How is that atheism?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Don't know who that is
      It's clearly gigachad

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      read OP's pic name. He's called Licensed Image

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Charles Fourier and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon were both older and also influenced Marx heavily.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >licesend-image
    I don't think you should be posting this here, anon.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    he is evil

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, he's just German man #286,897,212,567 that was unable to properly understand Christianity.

      The fact that one of the most theologically educated popes of the last 200 years was a German is perhaps one of the biggest miracles of this age.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        To properly understand christianity is to reject it. What characterizes its own adherents is that they themselves never fully understand their own worldview. If they saw things properly and in full, they would reject their nonsense on the spot.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Christianity comes from its adherents, who are therefore the only authority on it. Christians wrote the NT and built all the historical early Christian institutions that defined what it is. That you disagree with them on what their own worldview is, as expressed by themselves, is beyond stupid.

          It'd be like saying Marx didn't understand Marxism

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nietzsche liked him?

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most based philosopher.
    "The Essence of Christianity" just completely demolishes any moron that thinks sky daddy is real.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Christianity has already fallen if it didn't just burn him alive for his heresy.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Marx’s influences are not talked about nearly enough and it’s ridiculous that they aren’t

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    He doesn't overcome Hegel, he tries to surpass Hegel but ends up being refuted by Hegel, according to the Hackett critical assessment. Namely his conceptions of man and community don't critical express express the complexity of social relations. You can't have a whole theory based on the interplay of man and community basically.

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What had really induced me to attach so much importance to Feuerbach was the conclusion by means of which he had seceded from his master Hegel, to wit, that the best philosophy was to have no philosophy—a theory which greatly simplified what I had formerly considered a very terrifying study—and secondly, that only that was real which could be ascertained by the senses.

    >The fact that he proclaimed what we call ‘spirit’ to be an aesthetic perception of our senses, together with his statement concerning the futility of philosophy—these were the two things in him which rendered me such useful assistance in my conceptions of an all-embracing work of art, of a perfect drama which should appeal to the simplest and most purely human emotions at the very moment when it approached its fulfilment as Kunstwerk der Zukunft.

    >For a long time I had wanted to understand the real value of philosophy. My conversations with Lehrs in Paris in my very young days had awakened my longing for this branch of knowledge, upon which I had first launched when I attended the lectures of several Leipzig professors and in later years by reading Schelling and Hegel. I seemed to understand the reason of their failure to satisfy me from the writings of Feuerbach, which I studied at the same time.
    - Wagner, autobiography

    >Actively aroused by the perusal of some of Ludwig Feuerbach's essays, I had borrowed various terms of abstract nomenclature and applied them to artistic ideas with which they could not always closely harmonise. In thus doing, I gave myself up without critical deliberation to the guidance of a brilliant writer, who approached most nearly to my reigning frame of mind, in that he bade farewell to Philosophy (in which he fancied he detected naught but masked Theology) and took refuge in a conception of man's nature in which I thought I clearly recognised my own ideal of artistic manhood. From this arose a kind of impassioned tangle of ideas, which manifested itself as precipitance and indistinctness in my attempts at philosophical system.
    - Introduction to Art and Revolution

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      tl;dr
      >I like this guy because he confirmed all of my preconceived notions so I wouldn't have to analyze any of them, and told me drop the study of philosophy which I found too daunting and difficult for my taste

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Western Civilization is a centuries-long psychological human nightmare in which the minds of the masses are terrorized by demons, damnation, temptations and sexual desire, I am glad is ending, absolutely thrilled.

    I will keep Bach, Michelangelo, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, St. Francis, St. John of the Cross, many others who are in fact Individual Geniuses reflecting the greatness of the Human Spirit in general and not this dumb ass, prude ass, Western Dogmatic Roman anti-Body Rationality Cult

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    atheism,
    Kek, that's Schopenhauer. Nietzsche called Schopenhauer the first western philosopher who was openly an atheist.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >first western philosopher who was openly an atheist.

      18th century France had Nicolas de Condorcet and Denis Diderot

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer Anselm. Maybe because I also have a hardon for Italian girls.

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao, typical christcuck display of the eternal feminine, no fricking accountability of what you dumb fricks did to civilization.
    Best thing to ever happen to Christendom were the Borgias and the Medici.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *