Good question since there was a point when muslim armies were superior to european ones in many ways, geography was definetly atleast one of the reasons, there are easily defendable obstacles between brown people and white people, when it comes to converting people they were also not very efficient in places they did conquer for a while like Spain, who knows why people didn't want to convert
> muslim armies were superior to european ones in many ways
Muslim armies never were superior pound for pound, you dumb fricking fingolian.
The success they had in Europe was mostly attributable to divided and smaller, independent counties/ kingdoms they'd conquer.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes, they were. Muslims literally conquered the entire Iberian Peninsula, and could’ve conquered the whole of mainland Europe if it wasn’t for Charles Martel. Also, the Muslims completely dominated the Mediterranean Sea, and Indian trade routes. Hence why Columbus had to sail westwards to discover India since the Muslims dominated the trade routes.
Europeans merely surpassed Muslims around the 16th century. Also, the way Islam is administrated is a lot worse to Christianity/Catholicism since it is not centralised with a key-leader similar to a Pope. This led to a lot of infighting in Islam .
2 years ago
Anonymous
How shit is your reading comp, you dumb Black person. >Muslim armies never were superior pound for pound >The success they had in Europe was mostly attributable to divided and smaller, independent counties/ kingdoms they'd conquer.
>the Muslims completely dominated the Mediterranean Sea, and Indian trade routes. Hence why Columbus had to sail westwards to discover India since the Muslims dominated the trade routes.
whatever fricking makes you sleep at night sure
>Europeans merely surpassed Muslims around the 16th century. Also, the way Islam is administrated is a lot worse to Christianity/Catholicism since it is not centralised with a key-leader similar to a Pope. This led to a lot of infighting in Islam .
not even gonna address that cause it's not relevant to what I said.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They were superior, pound for pound. In fact, I’d argue the opposite. The sole reason why Islam didn’t conquer Europe was due to the fragmentation of Islam and the Islamic world. Europe was far more unified and better administrated since it had one core leader, the Pope.
Europeans were beyond weak at that period, absolutely jesters. They were uncivilised barbarians who couldn’t fight or could formulate strategies following the collapsing the Western Roman Empire.
2 years ago
Anonymous
fine do what you want, it's your word against mine, only that I can't be bothered to look/reference/cite the facts. So I'll do what you do and reverse the statement and leave it at that. And let's see who buys YOUR bullshit
>They were INFERIOR, pound for pound. In fact, I’d argue THAT. The sole reason why Islam didn’t conquer Europe was due to the fragmentation of CHRISTIANITY and the CHRISTIAN world. Europe was LESS unified and BADLY administrated since it had MANY LOCAL COUNTS, DUTCHES, AND REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Pound for pound maybe so but there was a period of time spesifically during the first caliphates and later with the ottoman empire when muslim armies were significantly larger and better supplied than most of those in Europe, it doesn't always matter if your soldiers are somewhat better if your enemy can throw 3-4 times as many to the fight, quantity is quality in its own to some degree
2 years ago
Anonymous
>armies were significantly larger and better supplied
look up the colloquial definition of pound for pound.
I'll give you a hint, it's use to compare the achievements of heavy weight fighters to those of lighter weight.
Jesus himself was a criminal, Jonah was running away from God, etc.
It's one of the differences between Christianity and Islam that all prophets are flawless in Islam, while in Christianity they're drunkards, thieves etc.
Don't know if you've noticed it but Christianity seems to go hand in hand with corruption. israelites perhaps being even further in the same direction, being seen as simultaneously the synagogue of Satan, and God's chosen people/a light unto the nations.
Islam suits groups of people who solve every issue they have with violence.
it never caught among groups of people with higher intelligent then what we see in the middle east.
****************************
DON'T BE DEFEATED
DON'T BE DEMORALIZED
FIND INFORMATION
BRING IT HERE
[...]
GET IN HERE!!!!!!
/ / / WEF Info in this thread... / / /
*****************************************************
These are the two WEF project leads coordinating the implementation of DIGITAL ID in YOUR country. I think we need to know more about them pol.
https://ch.linkedin.com/in/cristian-i-duda-9a92a21
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/juliedawson
The vaccine, the passports, the digital ID
this is a massive and coordinated roll out,
which people are behind it?????????
Islam suits groups of people who solve every issue they have with violence.
it never caught among groups of people with higher intelligent then what we see in the middle east.
Doesn't matter if white or brown. Both are sheep for following some ancient homosexuals. Frick Jesus and frick allah. I went to mecca this hajj season and wiped my coom all over that stupid black box.
This is as far as the Ummayad empire has gone, before getting rekt in France. and it was kept at that. Iberia while was under Muslim countrol, it still had a notable Christian population.
a few centuries later the Ottoman empire was expanding into Europe from the other side.
The Ottomans held a lot of Christian lands including Greece whom preferred keeping their own faith over Islam.
Both empires held lands with Christian populations, but the natives mostly (probably) kept their faith. I'm not sure about the ratio of Christian to Muslim population. or how much of the natives converted, or how much Muslims moved out by the end of Muslim reign during events like reconquista.
Now why did not these places accept Islam and why are they still majority Christian? >"You surely cannot guide whoever you like ˹O Prophet˺, but it is Allah Who guides whoever He wills, and He knows best who are ˹fit to be˺ guided."
Quran 28:56
Though, Some majrotiy Christian places in Europe become majority Muslim like Albania, Kosovo and Bosnia.
Arabs are from the arabian peninsula, they were most defiantly conquering big parts of the world, the only difference from white people is that the arabs didn't built or invest anything in their new territories because from the getgo they we just a bunch of morons with effective swords.
Everything in the earth, the skies and in between worship Allah.
The translation is a bit off. This is the Sura for Al-Tariq which translated means the "knocker". The knocker as a word is also used for humans which represents their footsteps knocking on the floor or their knocking on the door. So the stars name is "the knocker".
This is the sound for pulsar stars that by rotation make these knocking sounds. How can some pre person even make this stuff up?
Islam better fits with Arab/brown temperament. They can't control themselves the same way white people can that's why they have to throw trash bags over their women and cover their faces to keep them from being tempted in public.
Christianity is not only correct but it also better fits the temperament of white people.
Islam suits groups of people who solve every issue they have with violence.
it never caught among groups of people with higher intelligent then what we see in the middle east.
Again, it's a point, not sure it's correct though. It's a very common argument on /misc/, "goatfrickers" etc.
turks are white
WTF? nobody but turks think that.
you mean everybody but white supremacists think that
Nope. Even Southern Europeans are borderline white.
It didnt reach Europe like Christianity did.
why?
brown is any race that's not white
>brown is any race that's not white
japanese are not brown
Not for lack of trying since it's inception.
Because Balkaners and Iberians mostly exterminated Muslims ?
asian is the biggest muslim group by far. frick you globohomo
Primary reason was that muslims were incapable of conquering/converting european kingdoms
why
Good question since there was a point when muslim armies were superior to european ones in many ways, geography was definetly atleast one of the reasons, there are easily defendable obstacles between brown people and white people, when it comes to converting people they were also not very efficient in places they did conquer for a while like Spain, who knows why people didn't want to convert
> muslim armies were superior to european ones in many ways
Muslim armies never were superior pound for pound, you dumb fricking fingolian.
The success they had in Europe was mostly attributable to divided and smaller, independent counties/ kingdoms they'd conquer.
Yes, they were. Muslims literally conquered the entire Iberian Peninsula, and could’ve conquered the whole of mainland Europe if it wasn’t for Charles Martel. Also, the Muslims completely dominated the Mediterranean Sea, and Indian trade routes. Hence why Columbus had to sail westwards to discover India since the Muslims dominated the trade routes.
Europeans merely surpassed Muslims around the 16th century. Also, the way Islam is administrated is a lot worse to Christianity/Catholicism since it is not centralised with a key-leader similar to a Pope. This led to a lot of infighting in Islam .
How shit is your reading comp, you dumb Black person.
>Muslim armies never were superior pound for pound
>The success they had in Europe was mostly attributable to divided and smaller, independent counties/ kingdoms they'd conquer.
>the Muslims completely dominated the Mediterranean Sea, and Indian trade routes. Hence why Columbus had to sail westwards to discover India since the Muslims dominated the trade routes.
whatever fricking makes you sleep at night sure
>Europeans merely surpassed Muslims around the 16th century. Also, the way Islam is administrated is a lot worse to Christianity/Catholicism since it is not centralised with a key-leader similar to a Pope. This led to a lot of infighting in Islam .
not even gonna address that cause it's not relevant to what I said.
They were superior, pound for pound. In fact, I’d argue the opposite. The sole reason why Islam didn’t conquer Europe was due to the fragmentation of Islam and the Islamic world. Europe was far more unified and better administrated since it had one core leader, the Pope.
Europeans were beyond weak at that period, absolutely jesters. They were uncivilised barbarians who couldn’t fight or could formulate strategies following the collapsing the Western Roman Empire.
fine do what you want, it's your word against mine, only that I can't be bothered to look/reference/cite the facts. So I'll do what you do and reverse the statement and leave it at that. And let's see who buys YOUR bullshit
>They were INFERIOR, pound for pound. In fact, I’d argue THAT. The sole reason why Islam didn’t conquer Europe was due to the fragmentation of CHRISTIANITY and the CHRISTIAN world. Europe was LESS unified and BADLY administrated since it had MANY LOCAL COUNTS, DUTCHES, AND REGIONAL/LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS.
Pound for pound maybe so but there was a period of time spesifically during the first caliphates and later with the ottoman empire when muslim armies were significantly larger and better supplied than most of those in Europe, it doesn't always matter if your soldiers are somewhat better if your enemy can throw 3-4 times as many to the fight, quantity is quality in its own to some degree
>armies were significantly larger and better supplied
look up the colloquial definition of pound for pound.
I'll give you a hint, it's use to compare the achievements of heavy weight fighters to those of lighter weight.
we arent brown tho
>brown is any race that's not white
You are definitely brown, and you are not even Muslim, just fake Muslim, subhuman.
Most whites are atheists
Most christians are brown in south america and sub saharan
Bosnia is mixed. Only 55% muslims
>Most whites are atheist
Lol get a load of this memeflag moron shill
You are banned: lol and change ip. Sneed trannies
LOL
Higher the thief rate higher the belive in God
Jesus himself was a criminal, Jonah was running away from God, etc.
It's one of the differences between Christianity and Islam that all prophets are flawless in Islam, while in Christianity they're drunkards, thieves etc.
Don't know if you've noticed it but Christianity seems to go hand in hand with corruption. israelites perhaps being even further in the same direction, being seen as simultaneously the synagogue of Satan, and God's chosen people/a light unto the nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penitent_thief
Because islam is an arab supramasist ideology.
Your religion should advance and protect your people, otherwise its worthless. Just like modern Cucktholicism.
The Caliphates shattered because of the division between Berbers, Persians and Arabs.
>arab supramasist ideology
why?
Not sure it's correct but it's a point.
Bosnian, Pomaks, Albanians and Kosovars are white.
Sub Sahara Africa is Christian
>Sub Sahara Africa is Christian
"kosovars" dont exist you dirty peenoise
****************************
DON'T BE DEFEATED
DON'T BE DEMORALIZED
FIND INFORMATION
BRING IT HERE
GET IN HERE!!!!!!
/ / / WEF Info in this thread... / / /
*****************************************************
These are the two WEF project leads coordinating the implementation of DIGITAL ID in YOUR country. I think we need to know more about them pol.
https://ch.linkedin.com/in/cristian-i-duda-9a92a21
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/juliedawson
The vaccine, the passports, the digital ID
this is a massive and coordinated roll out,
which people are behind it?????????
THANKYOU ! ! !
Islam suits groups of people who solve every issue they have with violence.
it never caught among groups of people with higher intelligent then what we see in the middle east.
The middle east and Indonesia are full of brown people
Yeah a point that's been made already. It's not that different from what I said in the OP anyway, kind of just a rephrasing.
Actually, it's sand people, camel jockies, towl heads, chimps and Black folk.
5 distinct races, do your research before you post again, homosexual.
Doesn't matter if white or brown. Both are sheep for following some ancient homosexuals. Frick Jesus and frick allah. I went to mecca this hajj season and wiped my coom all over that stupid black box.
This is as far as the Ummayad empire has gone, before getting rekt in France. and it was kept at that. Iberia while was under Muslim countrol, it still had a notable Christian population.
a few centuries later the Ottoman empire was expanding into Europe from the other side.
The Ottomans held a lot of Christian lands including Greece whom preferred keeping their own faith over Islam.
Both empires held lands with Christian populations, but the natives mostly (probably) kept their faith. I'm not sure about the ratio of Christian to Muslim population. or how much of the natives converted, or how much Muslims moved out by the end of Muslim reign during events like reconquista.
Now why did not these places accept Islam and why are they still majority Christian?
>"You surely cannot guide whoever you like ˹O Prophet˺, but it is Allah Who guides whoever He wills, and He knows best who are ˹fit to be˺ guided."
Quran 28:56
Though, Some majrotiy Christian places in Europe become majority Muslim like Albania, Kosovo and Bosnia.
Yeah moron, as I said this "Europe didn't became Muslim" is just a fricking rephrasing of the statement in the OP that whites aren't Muslim.
they did not embrace Islam because it did not appeal to most of em. why did it not appeal? that's something else.
you're confusing Ummayads and Abbasids
No it's not "something else" moron.
*looks at flag*
so you are probably a white person.
you tell me what do you think of Islam?
>you look at the swedish flag and think white person
Maybe 200 years ago, he's probably browner that you are.
Wasn't Ummayad empire based even by western standards? Or did the arab golden age happen later/earleir.
Because arabs weren't colonising the world
Arabs are from the arabian peninsula, they were most defiantly conquering big parts of the world, the only difference from white people is that the arabs didn't built or invest anything in their new territories because from the getgo they we just a bunch of morons with effective swords.
Saturn cult. israelites and muzzies are both moronic and worship a planet for its neat little hexagon pattern.
Always this copy pasta.
Everything in the earth, the skies and in between worship Allah.
The translation is a bit off. This is the Sura for Al-Tariq which translated means the "knocker". The knocker as a word is also used for humans which represents their footsteps knocking on the floor or their knocking on the door. So the stars name is "the knocker".
This is the sound for pulsar stars that by rotation make these knocking sounds. How can some pre person even make this stuff up?
>judaism
>just israelites
Really makes one think
Islam only appeals to Arabs and Browns
Christianity is already majority black
Not for long.
Portions of northwestern China are Muslim, and they're asiatics, dude.
I'm using brown to mean anyone who isn't white, aka colored. moron.
>name any “p4p goat”
>they get killed by any heavyweight
Yet again pol takes an already stupid concept and somehow makes an even worse argument out of it Christ almighty
>tf
>tp
Nice try Adbi
It means, not all white people are stupid.
Whites ruled the world for too long so they simply underestimate everyone else and thus easily accept inclusivity shit.
Wrong
>person
That's a partially shaved Orangutan
mohamed was a white redhead ginger boy
bosnians are white
They kill or enslave whites, muslim or not.
Islam is only for low IQ 'people'
Islam better fits with Arab/brown temperament. They can't control themselves the same way white people can that's why they have to throw trash bags over their women and cover their faces to keep them from being tempted in public.
Christianity is not only correct but it also better fits the temperament of white people.
Similar to
Again, it's a point, not sure it's correct though. It's a very common argument on /misc/, "goatfrickers" etc.
I think Bosnians are considered white, also they practice a way less radical type of Islam.