yeah its pretty pathetic you make up rules but then say they don't apply to your diety for reasons, similiar to how a child will say it doesn't count because he said so
4 months ago
Anonymous
And I thought you had something to say, but you can be this moronic.
You are probably a dishonest theist larping as an atheist, cause I refuse to believe someone can be this moronic even if they are an atheist.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>had something to say
there isn't much to say when your entire "argument" is just philo 101 with the added rule it cna't apply to a diety because the same logic you use also ruins said argument, that and its quite clear you have a specific diety in mind otherwise it would be even more pointless to argue for a god but you world salad will also never be able to specify which one
In order for the past to be infinite N would have to be isomorphic to Z, because the cause-effect relationships must retain their order AND past-future relationships must retain their order (allowing that cause and effect can be supposed to happen in discrete chunks of time)
>expecting atheists to have anything to say beyond insults and ad hominems.
Can we all just see that the atheists here just want an excuse to watch their porn and do whatever they want? They don't have any valid reasons to believe in atheism.
I'll talk to you from both the historical and humanities side of this.
This is prehistory, so why talk about it.
This has nothing to do with humanities, the human condition or anything to do with humans.
Not even religion.
Punt to alternative theories of time
>its nonsensical to apply it to god because it just is
why
Cause it presupposes time before the existence of the universe, which is nonsensical.
why
This is just pathetic my bro.
yeah its pretty pathetic you make up rules but then say they don't apply to your diety for reasons, similiar to how a child will say it doesn't count because he said so
And I thought you had something to say, but you can be this moronic.
You are probably a dishonest theist larping as an atheist, cause I refuse to believe someone can be this moronic even if they are an atheist.
>had something to say
there isn't much to say when your entire "argument" is just philo 101 with the added rule it cna't apply to a diety because the same logic you use also ruins said argument, that and its quite clear you have a specific diety in mind otherwise it would be even more pointless to argue for a god but you world salad will also never be able to specify which one
>diety
>diety
>diety
In order for the past to be infinite N would have to be isomorphic to Z, because the cause-effect relationships must retain their order AND past-future relationships must retain their order (allowing that cause and effect can be supposed to happen in discrete chunks of time)
There would be infinite time though?
>expecting atheists to have anything to say beyond insults and ad hominems.
Can we all just see that the atheists here just want an excuse to watch their porn and do whatever they want? They don't have any valid reasons to believe in atheism.
define what is time
Don't bother. It's a fricking Oyish subject.
I'll talk to you from both the historical and humanities side of this.
This is prehistory, so why talk about it.
This has nothing to do with humanities, the human condition or anything to do with humans.
Not even religion.
This reads like something I would write, but I know for a fact I didn't write it. Well done.