When and why did the Muslims lose all their martial prowess

When and why did the Muslims lose all their martial prowess

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    In the 19th century during the ottoman breakdown ?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mongols

      Islam is a parastic culture, it's only as strong as the cultures it culturally conquers.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >moron that treat islam like a race/entity
        moronic homosexual

        It took the Russians decades just to pacify a few tribes of chimpers, meanwhile the Russians had been steamrolling the Turks for the whole century before that.

        Because they were hidden in a inhospitable terrain and it was way less than decades
        It took 20 years max
        >steamrolling turks
        Cant compare pitch battles to guerilla warfare

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        This.

        >moron that treat islam like a race/entity
        moronic homosexual
        [...]
        Because they were hidden in a inhospitable terrain and it was way less than decades
        It took 20 years max
        >steamrolling turks
        Cant compare pitch battles to guerilla warfare

        >moronic homosexual
        It behaves exactly like an arab supremacist cult would, that's why you b***hes cry racism when criticized.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          I dont you projecting homosexual b***h
          Also islamophobia isnt racism you moron

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Dilate, son of mut'ah.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            You sound like you were dominated by muslims in the past

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            that would require you not to be hovering around 68 IQ

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only Chechens n Dagestanis have maintained good soldiers after ~1850

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chechens got raped hard by Christian’s in Ukraine

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not strictly true, just that homosexuals LARP army got BTFO

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >get conquered by russians
      >get russified
      >still conquered and ruled by russia to this day
      >had to get some obese saudi to help them during the chechen wars
      >current ruler is a traitor

      Kys you moron
      Caucasians/chechens/dagestanis are a fricking meme and probably the most overrated people in history

      Arabs, Turks, Berbers, Afghans, Iranians etc.. are all 1000 times better warriors/soldiers than them
      Wheter its before 1850s and after

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        It took the Russians decades just to pacify a few tribes of chimpers, meanwhile the Russians had been steamrolling the Turks for the whole century before that.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Delusional kavkaznig lol. If they really wanted you our, you would have gotten the circassian treatment and also be spread out across the diaspora or just dead.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Arabs, Turks, Berbers, Afghans, Iranians etc.. are all 1000 times better warriors/soldiers than them
        >Wheter its before 1850s and after
        All true except for arabs.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          I mean even arabs and by miles
          Arabs had Odethanus, the lakhmids and ghassanids, the rashidun, the ummayads, the abbasids etc..
          And dont forget arabs helped them a lot during the chechen war like al khattab for exemple

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mongols

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mamelukes still had it, it was with modernization and the shift from cav warrior chimpouts into divisions of infantry with hierachies that fricked them.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ottomans were good in that manner
        Also its completely dumb to think of muslims like they were one single entity
        Its like saying why christians cant fight ?
        Completely dumb, you need to see each cases in particular

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah Ottos are the one obvious exception, but they have a very different mindset from Arabs

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            To be fair a lot of people shit on the arabs because of the modern era but historically speaking they were good warriors
            Romans and Persians used them as auxiliaries regulary in their wars
            You have odenathus who defeated the persians and saved Rome ass in the east, you have the muslim expansion of the 7/8/9th century
            When you think about it they were like the mongols, they had a one hit wonder but after fallen into the irrelevancy after their conquests but the thing is everybody think mongols are awesome but are always coping when we talk about arabs despite being the nearly same thing
            I wouldnt even say sometimes its fricking even worse for the mongol case

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Because Arabs are still somewhat relevant today but Mongols aren't. If there was no Russia, Mongolia would be part of China the same way Tibet is. Therefore you have all these HOI playing Chuds who are attracted to them coz they don't need to talk about them in their present state.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >arabs
            >relevant

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Dislike them all you want but right now the main business trend is in Dubai and people need to get on good terms with the Saudis because oil money is too good to ignore.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Historylet moron detected
      After the mongols you still have a lot of islamic powerhouses like the ottomans, the mughals, the safavids, the mamluks etc...

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Napoleon
      FTFY

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are you joking?

    Franco: A Concise Biography - Page 144
    >Supported by Italian and German air cover, the Moors and the Legionnaires swept north through the Spanish countryside from Seville towards Madrid, in a bloodthristy rampage in which women were raped, prisonners killed and corpses sexually mutilated by the Moors. Storming forward, they covered 200 kilometres in under a week, a flood of terrorised refugees surging ahead of them. Although Franco's brutal tactics may well have been driven by psuchological rather than military considerations, they proved highly effective. Not only did they provide an outlet for the bloodlust of African soldiers and eliminate an enormous number of potential opponents and witnesses, but they generated a crippling terror.

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I know it's a shitpost and I have only seconds before 404 but HOLY SHIT the para birdmen were fun. HAMAS aren't from the arabian peninsula but their sense of style is truly arab

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Middle Abbasid period. They have relied heavily on slave-soldiers (Turks and Berbers early on, Caucasians later) since then. Their military prowess is like a shooting star, happens brilliantly in an instance but disappear very quickly. Even now the best performing contingent of ISIS is the Churka one

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      He talked about muslims
      Not arabs

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Muslim iq has been in a decline due to cousin marriage. This is the main reason. While most of the golden age stuff is we wuzzing, that’s the main reason why Arabs have been in decline for a LONG time and have absolutely nothing besides oil. Turks are more recent converts and held out longer but are also in terminal decline

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hours after Hamas's attack, U.S. President Joe Biden promised "rock-solid and unwavering" support to Israel.[753] To replenish Israel's stockpiles, the U.S. said it would send Iron Dome missiles, small bombs, and JDAM conversion kits, in addition to fulfilling previous contracts to deliver F-35 fighter jets, CH-53 helicopters, and KC-46 air refueling tankers.[754] Biden also called on Congress to pass $14.3 billion in emergency military aid to Israel.[754][755]
    > the Pentagon said it would impose no limits on Israel's use of American weapons in the war.[754]
    > Foreign Policy reported on a "groundswell of opposition" among U.S. diplomats and national security officials, against what they perceived as Biden's "blank check" for the Israeli counterattack.[756]
    >The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Biden administration was planning to send $320 million worth of "Spice Family Gliding Bomb Assemblies", a type of precision guided weapon fired by warplanes, to Israel.
    > By October 10, more ships and troops were on their way to Israel, and additional troops in the United States were being prepared to deploy if requested. A large number of aircraft were sent to US military bases throughout the Middle East, and US special operations forces cooperated with the Israeli military in planning and intelligence.[1]
    >On October 15, the White House declared that it would attempt this week to get congressional approval of a fresh $2 billion weaponry aid package for Israel.[26]
    >By October 17, five shipments of American weapons and equipment had arrived in Israel.[1]
    >On October 20, Biden announced that the additional fund he asked Congress to authorize would come to a total of $14 billion, as part of a $105 billion military aid package.[3][10]
    >On October 21 the Pentagon declared that two of its most potent missile defence systems—a THAAD battery and extra Patriot batteries—would be deployed to the Middle East.[2][28]

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Countries winning war's don't count if they get military equipment gifted/sold to them by another state.
      The Soviets gifted Egypt+Syria+Jordan 3x's the Israeli armoured vehicle pool and 3x's the airforce.

      Almost every war that happened in the 20th century is inconclusive and based purely on outside involvement in that scenario.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      moslems have and always will get more outside aid

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      boiling rapeugee

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kek
    Arabs have never been capable, just human wave bugs

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    They never had any. Any land they ever took was decaying, weak empires (Persians and Indians) or didn't win until such empire did fall (getting their shit kicked in for several hundred years by Byzantines until they died off).

    So they never had any. Their only advantage is taking control once they have a majority. If they can't beat you via sheer numbers then they're not exactly a major threat.

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Arabs are racially inferior and cannot organize modern warfare.

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    They're still good fighters they're just bad at all the none combat parts of war. All the jihadist spirit in the world won't stop a drone strike

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Only Churkas and Nafris are good fighters. Ayyrabs have Pajeet-tier athleticism these days

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    lol mad that you don’t get a ceasefire anymore?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *