what is the most uncensored and original version of the bible. can recent versions even be trusted?

what is the most uncensored and original version of the bible. can recent versions even be trusted?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >he still believes christisraelitery
    lel

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The manicheans

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >uncensored
    What does this even mean in this context?
    >original
    Codex Sinaiticus Is the earliest complete one you will get without going fragmentary and “apocryphal”. But this is from quite some time after Christ. Your problem here is that everything was written down and put together some time after his death from originally oral traditions and there was no early agreement in what was correct.
    >can recent versions even be trusted?
    The canon has been much the same for centuries for most versions. So you would have to back a long time to make the argument that “recent” versions are any more untrustworthy, small translation differences not withstanding.
    At the end of the day you are a frog and you can go check your own versions until you get one you like and then not read past page one.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      in the uncensored version jesus says Black person a lot

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    None of them can be trusted they were written at least 80 years after the dudes death LMAO

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      preach

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    “It’s all written in fraudulent grammar, always was cause humans were purposely mislead in this area because perfect contracting was something that wouldn’t afford for the guidance of humanities development. Would the scribe class ever give up their power…… to answer your question anon, if you want a more original writing, you’ll have to learn Greek and Latin to read the older versions that aren’t as purposely obfuscated through mistranslation.”

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    There're a lot of texts from biblical times. The bible is only a selection made by the early church. The other texts, that didn't became part of the bible, are called the Apocrypha.

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well, the bible is just a curated collection of various texts, so you'd have to look for a specific part. Oh, and knowing Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, etc would help

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe the real true bible was the friends we made along the way.

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    You could just judge the followers by their actions, and decide for yourself if it's a practice that bears fruit, or if they just operate the slave machinery of archons

    1. there are freemasons among christians, some high priests in europe are masons

    2. the christians dont seem to care about this, or are ignorant? some churches have "daycare" type of stuff or programmes where they raise kids of other christians. yeah, freemasonry and kids seems like a terrible combination imo

    3. how many modern christians don't seem to have any objection with consumption of symbolic media? yeah they will say about "there's all this satanic symbology in all the stuff", they will admit "it's real", but that never stops them from consuming it, saying "if you go that route, you end up not consuming anything". Why is it bad to refrain from consuming the fruit this satanic world bears?

    4. despite all the stuff about satan in bible, many christians don't actually believe on the stuff too much, or don't take seriously enough

    5. those who take it seriously, and admit/know it has power over this realm, don't "care" about it, don't talk about it, don't talk about its effects on our modern geopolitics or anything that relates to their immediate lifes (ESG? depopulation? central banks?). The ultimate solution is "death will set me free" (as long as you believe in jesus)

    6. almost all christians i know irl took the vaxx. that's got to be literally the filter of who is npc and who is not. And I spoke with some christians who did not take, and while they seem more coherent and I get along with them well, I still can't get them to see the faults of believing "jesus alone will set me free". I'm of opinion that we ought to create a paradise here on earth, not wait for jesus, cause there's real possibility (like for those who've lived before us) that he will not appear to us. So no point in waiting, we should start being active, and I'm afraid Christianity doesn't promote that.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Such a long post without actually answering any of OPs questions.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's in the first sentence, "You could just judge the followers by their actions"
        You could just judge the followers by their actions

        >what is the most uncensored and original version of the bible
        it doesn't matter, because you're supposed to judge by actions

        >can recent versions even be trusted?
        also doesn't matter

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          I understand now.
          Why not just make it this short next time?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you glowie by chance? Obviously I had to make a point why it's good idea to judge by actions, by giving examples.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >are you a glowie by chance
            Glowie detected. I did think your long post was trying to derail. Now I see what you are.
            Get the frick out scum.

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Talmud, but you will have to learn Hebrew. All other versions have been tampered with. If you really do think that Jesus was the Messiah (I'm not so sure) The King James Edition has had the least tampering.

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Septugint for new testement.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *