Shoudn't religions come with a disclaimer?

>Disclaimer: Not a single person who met the alleged founder of our religion wrote anything down. The following narratives are based on anonymous stories written after they allegedly lived. Scholars disagree over which, if any, facts can be gleaned from these anonymous stories.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Let's ignore Jesus, because i'm a christian.

    Seems completely rational that whatever stuff is attributed to Mo and Buddha is 99% real, atleast for the primary texts and stuff, because it's a pretty consistent set of ideas(even if wrong) they talked about, and expanded on.

    And i'm someone who considers stuff like hadith chains of transmission to be utter bullshit.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ya see, most people like those religions. I don’t like region though cause I’m too smart for it. That’s why I joked the disclaimer should say they aren’t real.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Ya see, most people like those religions.
        They probably wouldn't if they had to include a disclaimer.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I don’t like region though cause I’m too smart for it.
        You believe that you are a monkey.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not the same anon but yeah, monkeys are cool.
          Want a banana?

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah they should come with a disclaimer… THAT THEURE FAKE!!!!! Hahahahhaah

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    why should i trust israeli scholars over the church fathers?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      99% of church fathers and 100% of the new testament writers were israeli.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's the difference?

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Not a single person who met the alleged founder of our religion wrote anything down.
    >The Prophet Muhammad disseminated the Koran in a piecemeal and gradual manner from AD610 to 632, the year in which he passed away. The evidence indicates that he recited the text and scribes wrote down what they heard
    god is real and ywnbaw

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw the prophet was illiterate, because of which he dictated to the companions

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Not a single person who met the alleged founder of our religion wrote anything down
    Matthew, John, James, Peter and Paul.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      None of these did, except Paul, and he did not meet Jesus and was a contrarion to the disciples, playing an act in front of them and after the split calling them hypocrites

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Paul met Peter. Peter wrote Acts. Peter met Jesus.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >peter wrote acts
          im dying

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Atheists and agnostics are mid-wits. Most cattle that follow a dogmatic system of faith have a very shallow understanding of the spiritual truths and the mid-wit takes their shallow understanding to be the whole of spiritual matters themselves.

    Divine logic and spiritual truths are ingrained into very being, can be comprehended (to an extent) physically through the perfection of natural order, and are expressed through symbols and memetics

    I find Gnostik Christology to be the peak of this understanding, but this is nothing without a wider ranger of spiritual and secular truths to undergird them

    tldr; OP talks like a flag and his shit is all moronic

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus is fascinating because so much contradicts it's impossible to tell what he was. Failed messiah? God incarnate? Apocalyptic preacher? Some sort of gnostic mystery religion teacher? You don't see the same level of confusion with who the Buddha or Muhammad was.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well about 2 billion people globally (including myself) say he's God incarnate. 1 billion (that is, Muslims) say he's a prophet and many other religions have a similar view. Some Hindus think he was an enlightened person or even a demigod (Indo-Aryans believing Arianism, what do you know)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *