I submit that Dillahunty is the reigning atheist cringe king. He has taken over the mantle from the New Atheists.

I submit that Dillahunty is the reigning atheist cringe king. He has taken over the mantle from the New Atheists.

>smug condescension
>supreme midwit
>atheist rage
>hides behind "I'm just saying we don't know!" when challenged
>wants the equivalent of a doctor's note or a marriage certificate as "evidence" of God
>denies that Jesus was even crucified

Checks all the boxes.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Enjoy. His fanclub is rabid in the comments. Based Christian trolls Dillahunty by refusing to engage in his games.

    https://www.youtube.com/live/cRCbvfyiu0s?si=bZsMiJxt3z87gMyj

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ray comfort
      >based christian
      christians are truly pathetic if this is their best

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        He just gets to the point. Everything comes down to belief, so why waste time pretending to argue over "evidence."

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >best Christian
        the fact that he's getting BTFO by some moronic protestant evangelical should clue you in that this Dill pickle guy is an embarrassment to his case, it's like if Richard Dawkins got slammed into the dirt by Michio Kaku, that wouldn't make Kaku look good, it'd make Dawkins look terrible

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Every argument i've ever seen from Ray Cumfart has been downright moronic, im not about to bet 2 hours of my day on him magically becoming sentient. Christianity dying in the first world is no wonder with this type of talent speaking it's case

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >CHRISTIANITY IS DYING!
            >ANY DAY NOW!
            >YOU'LL SEE!
            haven't heard that one any time in the past two thousand years

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            But you believe that Christianity died in 1965 with Vatican II.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            You must be really old.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            It is dying in all measurable aspects, if christians didn't seethe about this and just coped their way to irrelevance, they'd be much less annoying

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >just two more weeks
            >trust the plan fellow atheists!!!!

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >just two more weeks
            no one's claiming this, christianity has been on the decline though, and that's a good thing

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Belief in God has more or less stayed the same. This graph is misleading because the downward trend in churchgoing coincides with the overall decline in social participation seen everywhere from movie box office collapses to retail collapses.

            This isn't some "atheist victory"; it's just one tell among many of objectively declining civilization.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Belief in God has more or less stayed the same
            It has decreased, atleast belief in the christian god certainly has
            >This graph is misleading because the downward trend in churchgoing coincides with the overall decline in social participation
            The graph isn't about churchgoing, though that is on the decline as well and most certainly related to the decline in christian belief
            >This isn't some "atheist victory"
            In fact it isn't happening at all, 2 MORE WEEKS TAKE THAT ATHEIST SCUM
            >it's just one tell among many of objectively declining civilization.
            It's not happening bro, just atheist lies don't worry

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Agreed, the only effective counterapologists are former Christians with a deep understanding of scripture. Helps if they are level-headed and aren't just a seething fedoratipper with an axe to grind. I have yet to see a Christian who doesn't get bodied by this guy.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Jimmy Akin bodied him hard.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Lolno

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Helps if they are level-headed and aren't just a seething fedoratipper with an axe to grind
            Pic unrelated?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            No?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, to be fair he doesn't seem to personally have an axe to grind with the Christian faith, the only thing that seems to make him genuinely angry is questioning his supreme authority as a member of the holy expert magisterium. He just pretends to hate Christianity because he's a scam artist and throwing red meat to his audience of autistic fedora tippers makes him $$$

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            It was real in your mind. I've literally never seen him get angry about anything. He even maintained a cordial demeanor when Justin Bass was being a complete piece of shit. He doesn't even pretend to hate Christianity because he literally teaches at a seminary (though I have no idea why). Michael Heiser has done almost as much to dismantle the Bible but remained a Christian his whole life. People are just realizing the notion that primitive israelites had everything figured out (even by divine inspiration) is untenable and its making morons like you cope and seethe.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I've literally never seen him get angry about anything.
            You are an example of his fedora tipping audience, so seeing him shouting about "THIS IS WHAT SCHOLARS DO" seems calm and collected by comparison.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Post it

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.google.com/

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            But anon that's my source for why the Bible is full of shit.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Okay I used this very esoteric deepweb resource to look up Bart Ehrman angry and got a "I AM SILLY" comic in video format complete with clown music and facebook memes. Not a good look for Christcucks. I can admit he sounds more impassioned than usual here but there are no insults or condescension or rudeness such as you see with James White (especially when he debates other Christians). Nothing wrong with being passionate when Low Bar Bill is trying to gaslight people with bad math that begs the question.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Cope.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks for updating us on your twitter status

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            His entire career is a seethe. Tell me, do you devote your life to disproving things that you know are false? Why would anyone do that? It's because he has an axe to grind. It's always personal with these fedoras

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Why would anyone do that?
            Ehrman does it because fedora tippers give him lots of money to tell them what they want to hear.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well one reason he does it is the sams reason you flip burgers for 8 hours a day, its his livelihood. Also if this logic held water Christians wouldn't do apologetics or evangelism in the first place. The reason you put in effort to disprove things you believe to be false is because there are a lot of people who believe them to be true and you want them to come to your side; it can be as simple as trying to get someone to appreciate different music or it can be personal. For me, its personal. I am schizophrenic and when I believed all this nonsense, I thought everything was "muh spiritual warfare and refused to get treatment because it would just help the debil turn me into the literal antichrist or whatever. Since my deconstruction, even viewing these experiences through the lens of psychosis has done a lot to improve my ability to manage these thoughts. And I've also accepted treatment. I'm confident I'm not going to cross 8 lanes of traffic in my underwear because I think the spirit of God is leading me to a Christian commune again. I realize that's not most people's experience but I think this crap is mentally taxing for a lot of people. So what Bart Ehrman and Digital Harmarabi and others are doing is ironically a godsend afaic.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            You need glasses if you can't read that.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Well one reason he does it is the sams reason you flip burgers for 8 hours a day, its his livelihood
            Stopped there

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            I look like this and have already said this.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            You sure do

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      dillahunty ray comfort debate fricking lol
      that takes me back to 15 years ago

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    no abrahamcuck has ever refuted Dillahunty, atheistbros stay winning

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      What is there to refute? All he ever says is that he needs "evidence," but won't say what evidence that would be beyond "physical evidence like a doctor's note". If you provide evidence he just says "no that's a claim, I need evidence, like a doctor's note." He's a moron.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not getting a contradicting definition for God would be a good start.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          ??

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        he is correct tho, claiming israelite demon Yahweh exists, just because, it is only a claim, an opinion even, but not a fact

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Everything is a claim.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >i can no nuffin
            BOAH.. profound.. wisdom

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I have no idea what epistemology or philosophy of science is
            Midwit

            Without God we have no way to ground reality. No truth.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            truth used to mean you do what you say, truth after semites/christcucks was made abstract and can mean whatever you want

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            then how did ancient Pagan Greece do all the shit they did?
            they had no conception of god (the real god) but they sure seemed to have made strides.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            The canonical answer according to the Greek Orthodox Church is that the Hellenes stole everything from the israelites.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's incorrect, all men know God. Acts 17:22-31

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            How does the israelite in sky ground reality?
            Boom.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            By killing people who disagree

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >this guy needs to think about Jesus before being able to correctly answer true/false questions
            Pretty sure that’s some type of OCD. Whatever’s wrong your brain doesn’t work by your own admission

            Beings, and reality itself, can only exist in the mind of God. God sustains you and everything you think about.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            This would make sense if you were arguing for Odin or Zeus or some other real God that actually exts, but you're not, you're arguing for some madeup arab garbage.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Odin
            Third century warlord/shaman euhemerized by the Germanics centuries after he instituted a religious revolution. Most likely stole ideas from the Romans and convinced the moronic nordoids that the Roman ways worked.
            >Zeus
            Listening to Homer and Hesiod's take on Greek religion is a bit like reading Dante's Commedia (just the Inferno, no Purgatorio or Paradiso) and basing your perception of Christianity on that. They completely warped Hellenic (or rather, Helladic) religion into something totally different after the Bronze Age Collapse. You go back far enough in time, you get a completely different picture of how religion was done in Mycenae, and Knossos, and Argos etc. Some perceptions of Zeus were borderline monotheistic, retaining the traditional Sky-Father aspect indistinguishable from other tribal ur-monotheisms, and profoundly similar to the Semitic El and Sumerian Anu. Of course that's a localized phenomenon, as "Greek" religion before the Bronze Age Collapse was about as uniform as the Germanics.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Third century warlord/shaman euhemerized by the Germanics
            This is incorrect, Odin is the Allfather, the Germanic form of the Indo-European Sky Father. There's zero reason to think what you're suggesting given how much Odin lines up with every other Indo-European Skyfather. At most you can argue that calling him "the one characterized by divine fury" is based off of some particularly influential chieftain, but that would naturally require an existing Skyfather figure which would be Odin.

            >Blah blah blah I have never read the Illiad
            I can see your confusion, what with never having read the Iliad and all, and the Old Testament being based on it and Judaism being a degradation of a higher religion into a more degenerate form. But, no, the Mycenaean religion was very much polytheistic, as not only Homer attests by numerous Linear B texts.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            You didn't read my whole post. And you are completely deranged if you think Odin bears any resemblance to the Indo-European Sky-father. Why don't you worship Tiwaz of the Goths instead? He predates Odin by centuries in historical attestations, and is incontrovertibly the linguistic and archetypal evolution of the Dyeus-Phter.
            Why is there never any Tyr-worship, only Odin and Thor, the famous Marvel superheroes?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >And you are completely deranged if you think Odin bears any resemblance to the Indo-European Sky-father.
            Odin has all of the Skyfather characteristics.
            >Spear wielder
            >King of the cosmos
            >Literal father of all of the goodguys
            >Creator of humanity
            >Associated with eagles
            >Associated with corvids
            >Owns the sacred beverage
            >Source and master of magic
            >Goes around bullying people who are bad hosts
            >The sun and moon are his eyes
            >Married to the Earth Mother
            >Creates things with his thoughts
            >Has a clique of vengeance seeking groupies
            >Has a throne at the literal highest possible point in the universe
            >Associated with hanging
            >Defends the cosmic primordial cow
            >Inflicts and cures madness
            >Inflicts lycanthropy
            >Name derives from one of the two PIE roots that are used to refer to the Skyfather
            Tyr has none of that.

            >Why don't you worship Tiwaz of the Goths instead?
            The Goths did worship Odin, we're told that they did. Anyways, they worshiped Tyr as the martial progenitor of the race, in a similar role to Mars. This is how all Germanics worshiped Tyr.

            >incontrovertibly the linguistic and archetypal evolution of the Dyeus-Phter.
            He's incontrovertibly not. There's not a single linguist on Earth who would mistakenly conflate *Deywos and *Dyeus- as the same word.

            >Why is there never any Tyr-worship
            There is. You literally just said that the Goths worshiped him.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Odin's name derives from the word for "madness", it has nothing whatsoever to do with skyfathers

            >There's not a single linguist on Earth who would mistakenly conflate *Deywos and *Dyeus- as the same word.
            >The Proto-Germanic masculine noun *tīwaz (pl. *tīwōz) means 'a god, a deity', and probably also served as a title or epithet that came to be associated with a specific deity whose original name is now lost.[c][d] It stems from Proto-Indo-European *deywós, meaning 'celestial, heavenly one', hence a 'god' (cf. Sanskrit: devá 'heavenly, divine', Old Lithuanian: deivas, Latin: deus 'a god, deity'), itself a derivation from *dyēus, meaning 'diurnal sky', hence 'daylight-sky god' (cf. Sanskrit: Dyáuṣ, Ancient Greek: Zeus, Latin: Jove).[8][9][10]

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Odin's name derives from the word for "madness",
            Correct, from *weyt, which is one of the the names of the Skyfather. Funny how that works, isn't it?

            Anyways, you should read actually books (I recommend How To Kill a Dragon and The Horse, Wheel, and Language, given that you're completely new to this). But, more importantly, if you're going to be a Wikipedia scholar (you shouldn't) then you should at least read the article before commenting on it. "Tyr" does not derive from the PIE word for "God", it derives from the PIE word for "shine". The "*dyeus" in "*Dyeus Pther" means "(bright) Sky Father". "Tyr" derives from "*deywos", meaning one of something that shines.

            Both "*Deywos" and "*Dyews" derive from the same PIE root, "*dyew-" meaning "shining" (or bright, heavenly, etc, the PIE had a different conception of color than we do). It leads to "*dyews/dyeus", which is fossilized in the name "*dyeus pther". This goes on to become "dyaus pitar" in Sanskrit, "Zeus Pater" (the "z" was actually pronounces "dz") in Greek, and "Jupiter" (from "Ijupater" in archaic Latin) in Latin. Meanwhile, "*deywos" goes on to become a generic term for deity. In the Germanic world it's used as a suffix in kennings (at one point Thor is called "Þóratyr", which literally means "Thunder God"). It also goes on to become Latin Deus, Greek Theos, and Sanskrit Deva. In Sanskrit, "-deva" is used just like "-tyr" is for noun-incorporation. "Deva" is also used as a generic term for deity, and is especially used as a term to refer to Parvati, who is Shiva's wife.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >tradlarper only understands religion in terms of comic books
            jesus is literally an xman dude
            https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Jesus_Christ

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Why is there never any Tyr-worship
            One of the Asatru holidays, Sigrblot, explicitly invokes him.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >this guy needs to think about Jesus before being able to correctly answer true/false questions
            Pretty sure that’s some type of OCD. Whatever’s wrong your brain doesn’t work by your own admission

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I have no idea what epistemology or philosophy of science is
            Midwit

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >all he says is that I have to prove my claims!
        >why won't you just accept total bullshit like I do huh?
        You're a drooling moron

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's a false standard, an impossible test. A test designed to fail. Atheism is for morons and cowards.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          The only ones I see accepting total bullshit are atheists when an authority figure opens their mouth

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Make a testable God hypothesis.
        Then test that hypothesis.

        The whole issue is that as it stands God existing is a totally unfalsifiable claim.

        If you can create a God hypothesis that can explain observable facts about the universe, that would be a good proof for God.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          All "facts" are tautological and circular. Everything comes down to belief.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are theists really reduced to resorting to post modernism "truth isn't real, it's all a matter of perspective"?

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          This isn't science.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is literally science lol. Testing hypotheses is the bedrock of science.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, I mean the topic of discussion is not science.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sure, the topic is broader than science
            But if you want to prove God created the universe, creating a testable God hypothesis is a good way to do that.

            It is not unreasonable imo to demand a scientific standard for such a claim. This is not a purely philosophical claim. This is a claim about how the universe was created. If a God created the universe, how ever you define God, there should be signs in the universe that this was it's origin, same as how the microwave background radiation was an observable piece of data that confirmed the Big Bang when it was a hypothesis.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        What's the piece of evidence that led you to believe in god, specifically the christian god?

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>smug condescension
    midwit
    rage
    behind "I'm just saying we don't know!" when challenged
    the equivalent of a doctor's note or a marriage certificate as "evidence" of God
    These are the trademarks of every atheist ever, though

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I looked at the data and from what I could see most of those really liberal churches tend to dissolve. There are communities like centreplace (they unironically do good videos on other obscure religions) which just do spirituality, but most of the ones which split off wither away due to infighting.

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    literally who

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some homosexual with a troony bf.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've never heard an intelligent person use the term midwit.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      You just used it.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Use-mention distinction.

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still less insufferable than Daniel Pikatchu.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      For real, internet Muslim apologists are so infinitely moronic and dishonest I would prefer Matt and other atheists over them any day

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's often really hard to tell if a given muslim is actually being trained in taqiyya to mask the ineptitude of his religion and he just has to shout lies over you in an attempt at verbal violence to inflict defeat, or if you're dealing with an "honest" moron who's had the wool slipped over his eyes the whole time, since muslim religious leaders explicitly forbid muslims from actually learning about other religious, or for that matter, their own
        I'm quite certain that for all the accusations of "not reading the Bible" levelled at milquetoast Christians, that there are infinitely more Christians who have read the Bible than there are Muslims who have read the Quran; and likewise, infinitely more Christians who have read the Bible and the Quran than Muslims who have read the Quran and the BIble - Muslim religious authorities have a good 1984-thing going on here and they don't have any reason to give it up

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's that made you realize he was cringe? not the pronouns in bio? not the use of "cis" without irony?

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    You guys don’t actually think Jesus walked around doing magic, right?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's magic? Can you define that word for me? Preferably OED with linguistic evolution/comparison.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Magic (noun) - the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nature is supernatural. Supernatural is a meaningless word. God creates and sustains nature.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Supernatural (adj.) - attributed to some force beyond the laws of nature

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            What is a law of nature?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Can you answer the question?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >magic

      Derp. God is existence itself. Jesus was no more or less magic than our world. Which is pretty dang magic and amazing.

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >was in seminary
    >doesn't even know what a catechism is

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The quote is not even correct anyway. They don't use the same Bible. They would use the NIV whereas a baptist church would use the KJV.

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >denies that Jesus was even crucified
    Sauce? I really doubt he ever said that.

    >hides behind "I'm just saying we don't know!" when challenged
    ...OP, you just don't understand the atheist position. Most of us don't absolutely believe for certain there is no God, we just don't see evidence for one so we don't actively believe in God.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dillahunty is a total moron and said he wouldn't even believe if someone parted the ocean in the name of Jesus.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      He said that in the Trent Horn debate.

      Your position is moronic because you cannot prove anything with certainty. Everything is ultimately founded on faith. You live your life acting out beliefs, knowingly or unknowingly. So it is ignorant at best, deceitful at worst, to play dumb and attack religion as "faith" while pretending you live in the world of knowledge.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *